四肢游戏 体感控制器BODYPAD引进亚洲(也许火星了,因为比任出手柄还要早..任抄袭??)
日本GDEX公司近日发布消息，称其将引进法国XKPAD公司所推出的一款PS2/XBOX用特殊体感控制器“BODY PAD”，预定于8月底公开发售。http://www.cgtimes.com.cn/upload/2005_07/0507221630232615.jpg
http://www.cgtimes.com.cn/upload/2005_07/050722163023263.jpg
不同于单纯以按钮或摇杆的方式操控的各式控制器，这款被称为“BODY PAD”的控制器，是以感应手肘及膝关节的曲伸来对应各按钮的输入，因此玩家必须运动四肢来进行游戏的操作。
http://www.cgtimes.com.cn/upload/2005_07/0507221630232611.jpg
共分为左右手、左右手肘及左右膝6个部份
http://www.cgtimes.com.cn/upload/2005_07/0507221630232612.jpg
http://www.cgtimes.com.cn/upload/2005_07/0507221630232610.jpg
http://www.cgtimes.com.cn/upload/2005_07/050722163023267.jpg
“BODY PAD”包括6大输入装置，分别为手肘与膝关节的传感器，以及握于左右手的按钮输入装置，统一连接到佩带于腰部的无线传输装置，与安装于主机端的接收装置以无线电波的方式联机。为了因应不同游戏的按钮配置，接收装置部分亦可自行调整手肘与膝关节传感器与标准控制器按钮的对应关系，以对应不同游戏的设定。
各个部位对应什么按键可以自由设定
http://www.cgtimes.com.cn/upload/2005_07/050722163023261.jpg
http://www.cgtimes.com.cn/upload/2005_07/050722163023262.jpg
http://www.cgtimes.com.cn/upload/2005_07/050722163023266.jpg
在佩带“BODY PAD”之后，玩家可以手肘与膝盖的出拳收腿动作来当成一般控制器的标准按钮输入来玩游戏，搭配上左右手的十字钮与额外的操作按钮，便可顺利对应大多数的游戏。而最能配合实际肢体运动的游戏主要以格斗对战游戏为主，之外也包括节奏舞蹈类、运动类、拳击类等游戏。
http://www.cgtimes.com.cn/upload/2005_07/050722163023268.jpg
http://www.cgtimes.com.cn/upload/2005_07/050722163023269.jpg
http://www.cgtimes.com.cn/upload/2005_07/050722163023265.jpg
“BODY PAD”已于去年11月正式在欧洲地区发行，日本地区则预定于8月31日起在GDEX官方购物网站正式开始出售，预定推出对应PS2与XBOX主机的两个版本，定价均为7980日圆（约合人民币587元）。觉得自己运动量太少，或者是想尝试以实际拳脚体验精采格斗的玩家，不妨可以参考这款独特的体感控制器“BODY PAD”。
转自:http://www.cgtimes.com.cn/show.aspx?id=7350&cid=80 原来任出手柄的时候,那帖子我就说过,现在虚拟现实的连动作捕捉仪早就出来了,你两根遥控棒又算什么创新
很多玩家都说,动作捕捉这样高档的东西怎么可能运用到游戏上面?
也有很多玩家说,家用机上面,遥控,动作感应的,任第一个....
当时虽然我脑子里面有对bodypad的模糊记忆,但是是好久好久的游戏功略上看到的消息,一直想不起来...
刚刚再次看到....转个帖把.....
这款东西2004年11月就在欧洲发行了..... 完全不同的东西= =b
不战，仅说一句
刚刚在S1看到一点东西
关于类似运动感知技术以及相关控制机理，任天堂在美国专利局同样有记录，以下链接为2000年的归档，由任天堂的宫本茂先生等发明。
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=ptxt&s1=6,917,356.WKU.&OS=PN/6,917,356&RS=PN/6,917,356
[ 本帖最后由 zcscz 于 2005-12-16 04:54 编辑 ] 这种东西 -_,-
说白了在这样一个年代完全的创新已经是不存在的了
需要做的不是去探讨一个东西到底是不是连根基都是原创的
而是应该看他是否能带来真正的变革并将其扩大
这就象你翻出现在任何一个打着创新的游戏你总能找到在其他游戏中的要素
但这并不代表真游戏真的就没有新意
有些事情不必太吹毛求疵
我从一开始看到讨论革命手柄是否原创的时候就认为这个问题的本身就是很没有意义的
当作茶余饭后的消遣到是不错 /go 原帖由 zcscz 于 2005-12-16 01:59 发表
关于类似运动感知技术以及相关控制机理，任天堂在美国专利局同样有记录，以下链接为2000年的归档，由任天堂的宫本茂先生等发明。
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=ptxt&s1=6,917,356.WKU.&OS=PN/6,917,356&RS=PN/6,917,356
专利...
Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court for
the Application of Law to Stopping infringement of
Patent Right Before Instituting Legal Proceedings
(Adopted on 5 June 2001 at the 1179th Meeting of the Adjudication Committee
of the Supreme People's Court)
With a view to protecting the lawful rights and interests of patentees and other interested parties, these several Provisions have been made for the application of law to stopping infringement of patent right before instituting legal proceedings according to the relevant provisions of the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China, the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Patent Law), the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Civil Procedure Law):
Article 1Any patentee or interested party may file an application with the people's court for ordering the party against whom an application is filed, before instituting legal proceedings, to stop its or his act of infringement of the patent right in accordance with the provision of Article 61 of the Patent Law.
The interested party that files an application refers to the licensee of the licensing contract for exploitation of patent and the legal heir to the property right of the patent, etc.. Among the licensees of the licensing contract for exploitation of patent, the licensee alone of a monopolising exclusive patent license* contract may file an application with the people's court; the licensee of a sole exclusive patent license contract may file an application when the patentee does not.
Article 2Any application for ordering to stop infringement of patent right before instituting legal proceedings shall be filed with the people's court having jurisdiction over cases of patent infringement.
Article 3Any patentee or interested party who files an application with the people's court shall submit an application in writing, in which the interested party per se and the basic information thereof, the claims and the extent of and reasons for the application shall be clearly indicated. The reasons for the application shall include the specific statement that irremediable damages will be caused to the legitimate rights and interests of the applicant if the relevant act is not to be promptly stopped.
Article 4The applicant shall submit the following evidence when filing an application:
(l) The patentee shall submit document proving the authenticity and validity of its or his patent right, including, among other things, the patent certificate, claims, description and receipt of payment for the annual patent fee. Where the application filed relates to a patent for utility model, the applicant' shall submit the search report by the Patent Administrative Organ under the State Council.
(2) The interested party shall submit the patent licensing contract and the proof for filing the Patent Administrative Organ under the State Council; where the proof is not for filing, it or he shall submit the certificate of the patentee or other evidence that proves that it or he enjoys the right.
Where the licensee of a sole exclusive licensing contract files an application alone, it or he shall submit the proof of abandonment by the patentee of the application. The heir to the patent property right shall submit evidence indicating that it or he has already inherited or is in the process of inheriting the patent property right.
(3) The applicant shall submit evidence to prove that the party against whom an application is filed is committing or will commit an act of infringing its or his patent right, including the alleged infringing product and the technical features of the patented technology and the alleged infringing product and the comparison thereof.
Article 5The ruling made by the people's court to stop an act of patent infringement before instituting legal proceedings shall be confined to the application filed by the patentee or interested party.
Article 6Any applicant shall provide guaranty when filing an application; where no guaranty is furnished, the application is rejected.
Where the guaranty furnished by the interested party, in the form of pledge or hypothecation is reasonable and valid, the people's court shall grant its approval.
When the people's court determines the scope of the guaranty, it shall take account of the sales of the product in question and the reasonable. costs of storage and stock-keeping; of the losses that may be caused by stopping the relevant act of the party against whom an application is filed and other reasonable costs, such as the wages or salaries and of any other factors involved as Well.
Article 7Where, in the process of executing the ruling to stop the relevant act, the party against whom an application is filed may suffer greater losses due to the adoption of the measure, the people's court may order the applicant to provide guaranty in an extroactive manner. Where no such guaranty is provided, the measure to stop the relevant act shall be removed.
Article 8Any measure taken to execute the ruling to stop the act of patent infringement shall not be removed because the party against whom an application is filed provides a counterguaranty.
Article 9After accepting the application filed by a patentee or interested party to order to stop the act of patent infringement, the people's court shall make a ruling in writing within 48 hours where the application conforms with Article 4 of these Provisions upon examination; where the ruling is made to order the party against whom an application is filed to stop its or his act of patent infringement, the ruling shall be executed without delay.
Where it is necessary for the people's court to verify the relevant facts within the aforementioned time limit, the people's court may summon and inquire the one or both interested parties and, then, make the ruling in a timely manner.
The people's court making the ruling to order the part) against whom an application is filed to stop the relevant infringing act before instituting legal proceedings shall promptly notify the party against whom an application is filed, or does so within no more than 5 days at the latest.
Article 10Where the interested party is not satisfied with the ruling, it or he may apply for reconsideration within l0 days from the date of the receipt of the ruling. The execution of the ruling shall not be suspended during the reconsideration.
Article 11The people's court shall examine the application for reconsideration filed by the interested party as to the following aspects:
(l) whether or not the act which is being committed or will be committed by the party against whom an application is filed constitutes an infringement of patent right;
(2) whether or not not taking the relevant measure will cause irremediable damages to the legal rights and interests of the applicant;
(3) the content of the information relating to the applicant's provision of the guaranty; and
(4) whether or not to the order the party against whom an application is filed to stop the relevant act would impair the public interests.
Article 12Where the patentee or interested party does not institute legal proceedings within l5 days, after the people's court takes the measure to stop the relevant act, the people's court shall remove the adopted measure of the ruling.
Article 13Where an applicant does not institute legal proceedings or there is an error in the application, causing losses to the party against whom an application is filed, the party against whom an application is filed may institute legal proceedings in the people's court having the jurisdiction, requesting the applicant to compensate for the losses; or file a request for damages during the patent infringement litigation instituted by the patentee or interested party. The people's court may simultaneously handle the requests.
Article 14The ruling ordering to stop the infringement of patent right shall generally remain effective until the final legal instrument comes into effect. The people's court may also fix a specific time limit according to the facts of the case; after the expiration of the time limit, the people's court may still make a ruling to continue to stop some relevant acts on the request of the interested party.
Article15Where the party against whom an application is filed runs counter to the ruling made by the people's court to order to stop the relevant act, the matter shall be handled according to the provision of Article l02 the Civil Procedure Law.
Article 16When executing the pre-litigation measure to stop the act of patent infringement, the people's court may, according to the application of the interested party, simultaneously preserve the evidence in the light of the provision of Article 74 of the Civil Procedure Law.
The people's court may, according to the application of the interested party, preserve the property pursuant to Articles 92 and 93 of the Civil Procedure Law.
Article 17Where the patentee or the interested party institutes proceedings against patent infringement, when simultaneously requesting for stopping the act of patent infringement in advance, the people's court may first make the ruling on the request.
Article 18In respect of a case to stop an act of patent infringement, the applicant shall pay the fees according to the Standards of the People's Court for Litigation Charges and the Additional Provisions thereof.
Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Issues Relating to Application of Law to Adjudication of Cases of Patent Disputes
(Adopted on 19 June 2001 at the 1180th Meeting of the Adjudication Committee of the Supreme People's Court)
With a view to duly adjudicating cases of patent disputes, the following Provisions are made in accordance with the provisions of the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the General Principles of the Civil Law), the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China, (hereinafter referred to as the Patent Law), the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China and the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China:
Article 1. The people's court accepts following cases of patent disputes:
1. disputes over the ownership of the right to apply for patent;
2. disputes over the ownership of the patent right;
3. disputes over contracts for assignment of the patent right or the right to apply for patent;
4. disputes arising from patent infringement;
5. disputes arising from counterfeiting other persons' patents;
6. disputes over the exploitation fee after the publication of the applications for patent for invention and before the grant of the patent right;
7. disputes over the reward and remuneration for the inventors or creators of service inventions;
8. cases of pre-litigation requests for stopping infringement or for property preservation;
9. disputes over the qualification of inventors or creators;
10. cases of dissatisfaction with the reexamination decisions by the Patent Reexamination Board to uphold rejection of applications;
11. cases of dissatisfaction with the reexamination decisions by the Patent Reexamination Board on requests for invalidation of the patent right;
12. cases of dissatisfaction with the reexamination decisions by the Patent Administrative Organ under the State Council on execution of compulsory licenses;
13. cases of dissatisfaction with the adjudication by the Patent Administrative Organ under the State Council on the royalties for execution of compulsory licenses;
14. cases of dissatisfaction with the administrative reexamination decisions by the Patent Administrative Organ under the State Council;
15. cases of dissatisfaction with the administrative decisions by the administrative authorities for patent affairs; and
16. any other cases of patent disputes.
Article 2. Patent dispute cases of first instance shall be under the jurisdiction of the intermediate people' courts of the seats of the People's Government of the Provinces, Autonomous Regions and Municipalities under the Central Government and the intermediate people' courts designated by the Supreme People's Court.
Article 3. Where any interested party, dissatisfied with the reexamination decision made by the Patent Reexamination Board after 1 July 2001 on the requests for revocation of a patent for utility model or design, institutes a lawsuit in the people's court, the people's court does not accept the lawsuit.
Article 4. Where any interested party, dissatisfied with the reexamination decision made by the Patent Reexamination Board after 1 July 2001 to uphold the rejection of the application for patent for utility model or design or with the decision on the request for invalidation of the patent right for utility model or design, institutes a lawsuit in the people's court, the people's court shall accept the lawsuit.
Article 5. Lawsuits instituted against acts of infringement of the patent right shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's court of the place where the defendant has its or his domicile or of the place where the infringing acts take place. Places where acts of infringement take place include: places where acts take place of manufacturing, using, offering for sale, selling or importing products accused of infringing a patent for invention or utility model; places where the acts of using a patented process takes place and where acts take place of using, offering for sale, selling or importing products acquired directly according to the patented process; places where acts of manufacturing, selling or importing products of patented designs; places where acts of counterfeiting patents of other persons take place; and places where consequences of the preceding infringing acts arise.
Article 6. Where a plaintiff takes action against the manufacturer of an infringing product, but not against the seller as well and the places where the infringing products are manufactured and sold are not the same place, the people's court of the place of the manufacture has the jurisdiction thereover; where the action is taken with both the manufacturer and seller accused as the co-defendants, the people's court of the place where the infringing products are sold has the jurisdiction.
Where the seller is a subsidiary of the manufacturer and the plaintiff takes action against the act of the infringing product manufacturer to manufacture and sell the product, the people's court of the place where the products are sold has the jurisdiction.
Article 7. Where a plaintiff institutes a lawsuit with respect to the patent application filed before 1 January 1993 and on the basis of the patent for invention of process granted to the application, the lawsuit is under the jurisdiction as determined in the light of the provisions of Articles 5 and 6 of these Provisions.
The people's court, in substantial hearing of the preceding cases, applies the provision that a patent for invention of process is not extended to the product.
Article 8. Any plaintiff takes action against an infringement of patent right for utility model shall produce the search report made by the Patent Administrative Organ under the State Council when instituting the lawsuit.
Where any defendant involved in the case of dispute arising from the infringement of the patent right for utility model or design shall, when making its or his defence, file a request for invalidation of the plaintiff's patent right.
Article 9. Where the defendant files a request for invalidation of the patent right when making its or his defence in the case received by the people's court of dispute as arising from the infringement of the patent right for utility model or design, the people's court shall suspend the legal proceedings. However, under any one of the following circumstances, the legal proceedings may not be suspended:
(1) where no technical documentation is found in the search report produced by the plaintiff that results in the loss of novelty or inventiveness of the patent for utility model;
(2) where the defendant's evidence is sufficient to prove that its or his used technology has been known to the public;
(3) where the proof or basis the defendant has furnished for requesting the invalidation of the patent right in question is obviously insufficient; or
(4) any other circumstances where the people's court finds that the legal proceedings should not be suspended.
Article 10. Where the defendant files a request for invalidation of the patent right in question after the expiration of the time for making defence in a case received by the people's court of dispute arising from the infringement of the patent right for utility model or design, the people's court shall not suspend the legal proceedings, except that it is found necessary to do so upon consideration.
Article 11. Where the defendant files a request for invalidation of the patent right in question in a case received by the people's court of dispute arising from infringement of patent right for design or one from infringement of patent right for utility model or design in which the Patent Reexamination Board uphold, upon examination, the patent right, the people's court may not suspend the legal proceedings.
Article 12. Where the people's court decides to suspend the legal proceedings, the patentee or the interested party requests for ordering the defendant to desist from the relevant act or for taking other measures to halt the spread of damages caused by the infringement and provides guaranty, and the people's court, upon consideration, finds it in compliance with the provisions of the relevant laws, the people's court may simultaneously make the relevant ruling when deciding to suspend the legal proceedings.
Article 13. Where the people's court preserves property of the patent right, it shall send the Patent Administrative Organ under the State Council a notification for assistance in execution of the property preservation, indicating the matters for which assistance is sought and the duration of the patent right preservation, with the people's court ruling paper attached.
For a patent right preservation that shall not last more than six months, the term is counted from the date the Patent Administrative Organ under the State Council receives the notification of assistance for execution. If it is still necessary to continue to take the measure to preserve the patent right, the people's court shall send to the Patent Administrative Organ under the State Council the notification of assistance for executing the continued preservation before the expiration of the time limit fixed for the preservation. Where such notification is not delivered before the expiration of the time limit fixed for the preservation, the property preservation of the patent right is deemed to have been automatically released.
The people's court may take the property preservation measure for the pledged patent right, the pledgee's priority of compensation is not affected by the preservation measure; the exclusive licensing contract concluded between the patentee and the licensee does not affect the people's court's adopting the property preservation of the patent right.
The people's court shall not re-preserve the patent right that has been preserved.
Article 14. Where in respect of any invention-creation completed before 1 July 2001 by making use of the material and/or technical condition of the entity to which the inventor or creator belongs, the entity and the inventor or creator has concluded a contract, agreeing on the ownership of the right to apply for patent and of the patent right, the agreement shall be observed.
Article 15. Where any case received by the people's court of dispute arising from patent right infringement relates to conflict of rights, the legitimate rights and interests of the interested party that enjoys the prior right according to law shall be protected.
Article 16. The prior legitimate rights referred to in Article 23 of the Patent Law include the trademark right, copyright, right of enterprise name, portrait right and the right to use the package or decoration peculiar to any known goods, etc.
Article 17. The first paragraph "the extent of protection of the right for invention or utility model shall be determined by the terms of the claims. The description and the appended drawings may be used to interpret the claims" of Article 56 of the Patent Law means that the extent of protection of patent right should be determined by the necessary technical features expressly stated in the claims, including the extent as determined by the features equivalent to the necessary technical features.
The equivalent features refer to the features which uses substantially the same means, perform substantially the same function and produce substantially the same as the stated technical features and which can be contemplated by an ordinarily skilled artisan in the art without inventive labour.
Article 18. Where any act of patent infringement takes place before 1 July 2001, the civil liability under the Patent Law before this revision shall apply; where such act takes place after 1 July 2001, the provisions of the revised Patent Law shall apply to impose the civil liability.
Article 19. Where any one counterfeits another person's patent, the people's court may impose, on it or him, the civil liability according to the provision of Article 58 of the Patent Law. Where the administrative authority for patent work does not impose any administrative penalty, the people's court may impose civil penalty pursuant to the provision of Article 134, paragraph three, of the General Principles of the Civil Law, and the amount of the applicable fine in civil terms may be determined in the light of the provision of Article 58 of the Patent Law.
Article 20. Where the people's court imposes liability for compensation on the infringer according to the provision of Article 57, paragraph one, of the Patent Law, it may, on the request of the rightholder, determine the amount of compensation according to the losses suffered by the rightholder due to the infringement or the interests sought by the infringer from the infringement.
The losses suffered by the rightholder due to the infringement may be computed by the total of the infringing products sold in the market times the reasonable profit of each infringing product. Where it is difficult to determine the total reduction in the volumn of sale by the rightholder, the total of the infringing products sold in the market times the reasonable profit of each infringing product may be deemed to the losses suffered by the rightholder due to the infringement.
The interest of the infringer from the infringement may be computed according to the total of infringing products sold in the market times the reasonable profit of each infringing product.The income of the infringer from the infringement is generally counted according to the business profit of the infringer. As for the infringer who soly engages in infringement as its or his entire business, the income may be computed according to its or his sales profit.
Article 21. Where the losses of the infringee or the income of the infringer is difficult to be determined, the people's court may, where the patent licensing fee may be referred to, determine the reasonable amount of compensation according to the kind of patent right involved, the nature and facts of the infringement by the infringer, the amount of the patent licensing fee, the nature, extent and time of the patent license with reference to one to three times the patent licensing fee; where there is no patent licensing fee to be referred to or the license fee is obviously unreasonable, the people's court may, according to the factors, such as the kind of the patent right, the nature and facts of the infringement, determine the amount of compensation of more than RMB 5,000 yuan and less than RMB 300,000 yuan, but not exceeding RMB 500,000 yuan at most.
Article 22. The people's court may, on the request of the rightholder or according to the specific facts of a case, include the reasonable expenses paid for investigation or for stopping the infringement in the amount of compensation.
Article 23. The limitation for action against patent right infringement is two years, computed from the date when the patentee or the interested party knows or has reasonable grounds to know about the infringing act. Where the rightholder does not take action until two years later and if the infringing act continues when the action is taken, the people's court shall, within the term of validity of the patent right in question, rule that the defendant desist from the infringing act, and the amount of compensation for the infringement shall be computed from two years before the date when the rightholder institutes legal proceedings in the people's court.
Article 24. The offering for sale referred to in Articles 11 and 63 of the Patent Law means the expression of will for sale by way of advertisement, shop window display or exhibition.
Article 25. Where the people's court receives a case of dispute arising from patent infringement in which the administrative authority for patent affairs has made an infringement or non-infringement determination, the people's court may, on the request of the interested party to the lawsuit, carry on a comprehensive examination.
Article 26. Where there is any discrepancy between the former relevant judicial interpretations and these Provisions, these Provisions shall prevail
任为了当时几乎更本用不上的东西而花费资金去申请个专利
1能说明任有钱
2能说明任有意识(以后别人真的想用这项技术开发什么东西的时候,他就可以光明正大的出来收钱,虽然说他自己当时用的概率很小)
感知技术以及相关控制机理的专利早在上个世纪就有很多很多专利....几乎是不计其数.....拿专利来说事一点用都没,要的是实际成品
如果你够无赖,够卑鄙,够有钱,够有能力,够有远见,你完全可以去把www.nintendo.com,这样的类似的域名抢先个几年注册下来,到那时候他们公司要用域名的时候只有乖乖的给你钱
实际案例:腾讯
[ 本帖最后由 小毛头 于 2005-12-16 16:05 编辑 ] 似乎只能玩FTG 原帖由 加藤明浩 于 2005-12-16 07:39 发表
这种东西 -_,-
说白了在这样一个年代完全的创新已经是不存在的了
需要做的不是去探讨一个东西到底是不是连根基都是原创的
而是应该看他是否能带来真正的变革并将其扩大
这就象你翻出现在任何一个打 ...
主要当时很多玩家都说,动作捕捉这样高档的东西怎么可能运用到游戏上面?就算出了也买不起.
是为了这点我才发的,告诉他们动作捕捉用在游戏上面2004就有拉~且价格还算厚道 此等帖去发S1和tgfc好了..这里战不起来地...
[ 本帖最后由 风来人 于 2005-12-16 23:43 编辑 ] 原帖由 风来人 于 2005-12-16 23:35 发表
此等帖去发S1和tgfc好了..这里战不起来地...
再次说明
主要当时很多玩家都说,动作捕捉这样高档的东西怎么可能运用到游戏上面?就算出了也买不起.
是为了这点我才发的,告诉他们动作捕捉用在游戏上面2004就有拉~且价格还算厚道
想战的话,自己转贴吧,^_^ ……只是出于这个目的就不应该加上任抄袭了
以上非指责，仅建议
说过不战 哈哈一进来果然又是某人。。
之前的方块 说小任 无耻
现在人家注册专利又JJYY。。果然。。什么都要给你实物 你才认爹娘？ 这个玩起来比革命更累~
我看一般人也就坚持1分钟就不行了 这个也就玩玩格斗吧~面向太单一了（毕竟没有详细的手指捕捉等~十分的简化......）......~累不说空间问题要解决....不过价格到是很厚道~希望电脑上能出廉价的类似产品~能用在3D软件上（最多手指俺自己调或者拿现成的套就是了~.....XD）~呵呵~
PS：说任抄袭貌似不妥吧？既然有专利在（无论你愿意否这是事实......）~~建议改写一下主题.......
[ 本帖最后由 秋风剑士 于 2005-12-18 00:19 编辑 ]
页:
[1]