|
发表于 2005-6-17 03:23:27
|
显示全部楼层
But they do raise a good point. Technology-wise, there is not that much difference between HDTV and normal TV, the only thing that's different is the screen ratio (9:12 VS 3:4).
By not using HDTV, Nintendo can develop games more efficiently, allocate more speed and resource to devote to making the game more intensive, interesting, and fruitful (story-wise).
Nintendo follows a tradition of making quality game, not just games that's designed to impress those young kids who are impressed with flashy graphic. I am an old school gamer, I believe the story, the game play, and the innovation idea are the most important qualities of the game, not graphics.
Sony and MicroSoft devoted so much time and energy on making the game have better graphic, they put a heavy burden on the developer. Which increase the cost, which the costs will come out from consumer's pockets. By not adopting to HDTV, Nintendo is saving money for gamers.
Besides, Nintendo Revolution not "adopting" HDTV, they never did said anything about not "able" to play on HDTV.
The technological analysis comes from my knowledge gained from bachelor degree in computers, and getting masters.
So in conclusion, you are right to be concerned, but I would still get Nintendo Revolution regardless of this issue. As the matter of fact, from the technology point of view, I'll be able to affort more games from Nintendo than any other console, so I believe Nintendo is making a risky, yet smart decision.
P.S. 小岛秀夫示SONY期待能够在PS3上表现出极高的画面素质,但其实并不是每个游戏厂商都能够达到这个质量。与之相比,Xbox360的游戏制作起来就比较容易了,他将PS3比喻成1年只能吃2到3次的高级料理,而Xbox360则是1个月能吃个2到3次的特制套餐,Revolution则是每天都能在家吃到的美味家常菜。 |
|